UNBELIEVABLE: Fusion GPS Founders Continue Their Lies – Claim AG Barr Twisted Mueller Report Beyond Recognition

Fusion GPS Founders and hacks, Glenn Simpson and Peter Fritsch, had the gall to place an oped in the UK’s far-left Guardian entitled Britain needs its own Mueller report on Russian ‘interference’.  In their piece they share the unreal.  It’s like they’re from another universe and the DOJ IG report never came out on Monday [emphasis and numbers added]: 
Fusion GPS, conducted much of the early investigations into Russia’s support of the Trump campaign, aided by our colleague Christopher Steele, the former head of MI6’s Russia desk. While our initial focus was on Russian meddling in US politics, it has since become increasingly clear that Britain’s political system has also been deeply affected by Russian influence operations.
There the similarities end. For the past three years, the US has undergone a messy and boisterous effort to understand the extent of Russian influence on the 2016 election and beyond. There have been multiple congressional investigations with the power to compel documents and testimony from witnesses. There was a two-year investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller.
After mostly ignoring the issue during the election campaign itself, the US media have made up for lost time by digging deeply into Russian interference and the extent of the Trump campaign’s complicity [1].
All of these investigations have been imperfect. The congressional investigations often devolved into farce as Trump’s political allies decided to investigate the investigators instead of Russia’s attack.[2]  The Mueller report’s damning findings were obfuscated by lawyerly language and twisted beyond recognition by Trump’s loyal attorney general.[3]  Mueller interpreted his mandate narrowly, leaving crucial questions unanswered.[4]
But the process did produce an avalanche of documents and testimony, a great deal of it public, that has aided understanding of what occurred. That makes it harder for Russia to reprise its attack. The Mueller report’s main finding – that Russia had engaged in a “sweeping and systematic” campaign to elect Trump – was unambiguous and thoroughly documented.[5]  So too was Mueller’s clarion call for Americans of all political persuasions to wake up to the continuing threat of Russian interference in its politics.
In Britain, the official response has consisted largely of denial. Consumed by bitter divisions over Brexit and public spending, it took years longer than it should have for parliament to conduct an investigation of Russian penetration of British politics. Even now, the government has suppressed its findings until after the election – an unconscionable decision given the importance to the democratic system itself.
Many US institutions have shown more backbone and independence than their UK counterparts. Some of those who served in the Trump administration, such as the British-born Fiona Hill and Lt Col Alexander Vindman, have been willing to stand up in public and tell the truth, despite intimidation from the president and his allies. In the UK, the courageous whistleblowers needed to expose Russian influence have yet to emerge.
What a pile of garbage.  These guys are perhaps the biggest liars in the entire Russia collusion sham. 
They admittedly hired Christopher Steele who created a bogus dossier that we now know was false in January 2017, and in spite of this knowledge, Obama’s Deep State FBI, DOJ and Intel Community pushed this Fusion GPS piece of garbage on the American people and used it in an attempted coup to remove President Trump from office.
These two goons who put the US and President Trump through hell over the past 3 years claim:
1. Russian interference and the extent of the Trump campaign’s complicity.
As we now know there was no complicity between the President and Russia.  The whole thing was made up by perhaps Simpson himself.  The IG report released this past week confirmed that it was all made up.  Steele’s only sub-source in the Steele dossier said it was “word of mouth and hearsay” and a “conversation that[he/she] had with friends over beers”.  It was total garbage.
Trump had no relationship with Russia and 6 of 8 of the incidents noted in the Mueller report where there was contact between the Trump campaign and ‘Russians’ were set-ups by the Deep State.

The IG report states the comments from the sub-source:
2. The congressional investigations often devolved into farce as Trump’s political allies decided to investigate the investigators instead of Russia’s attack.
The gall of these guys.  They made millions and put America through hell for three years because of the lies they spread from the beginning.  The only farce in this discussion is Fusion GPS.
3. The Mueller report’s damning findings were obfuscated by lawyerly language and twisted beyond recognition by Trump’s loyal attorney general. 
What an absolute lie.  AG Barr should sue these guys for slander.  For all we know, and based on reports, the AG’s interactions with the bogus Mueller gang report were limited.  The AG redacted almost nothing in the Mueller report.  To claim that the AG twisted the Mueller report with lawyerly language is unsupported and clearly just another Fusion GPS lie.  What goons.
4. Mueller interpreted his mandate narrowly, leaving crucial questions unanswered.
This too is incorrect and therefore slanderous.  One of the key arguments that we made for three years was that Mueller’s special counsel was unconstitutional because the law requires a scope limited to a crime but Mueller and his gang looked into everything.  They went back and indicted Paul Manafort for tax evasion from years ago and for not filling out FARA forms which are literally almost never prosecuted before the Mueller investigation started to do so.  Only a few of the individuals who hadn’t completed FARA documents were prosecuted over the past few decades.
5. The Mueller report’s main finding – that Russia had engaged in a “sweeping and systematic” campaign to elect Trump – was unambiguous and thoroughly documented.
What a bunch of bull.  This remark is repeated even by Republicans, but it couldn’t be further from the truth.  The original sin that supposedly started this sham was that the DNC was hacked by the Russians.  To this day we have never seen evidence of this.  Actually what is proven in public, the WikiLeaks emails from the Clinton campaign released before the 2016 election, show that the emails were not even hacked.  This key point Roger Stone was not allowed to present during his case in front of corrupt Obama Judge Amy Berman Jackson.
We reported on May 11, 2019, that Roger Stone and his legal team requested the report from Crowdstrike, the firm connected with the Deep State who reportedly did inspect the DNC server after emails were released by WikiLeaks.  This report was used by the FBI and the Mueller gang as support that the DNC was hacked by Russia. 
Stone’s position was that if the Mueller team and the FBI did not inspect the DNC server, then how can they know that the server was hacked. This logical argument makes sense – 
The Mueller team fought back against the Stone team and argued that it was not necessary to see the documents that support that Russia hacked the DNC – 
We’ve been saying for months that the entire Russia collusion delusion is a sham. To date there has been no information reported that ascertains that the DNC was hacked by the Russians. No reports to date show that the DNC server was inspected by the Mueller team and the FBI. Since this is the case, there is no way the Mueller team can claim the server was hacked.
Since there is no proof that the emails were hacked, the reports that Russians were involved in the collusion delusion evaporate. This would have destroyed the entire Russian sham make-believe case. Our reporting has been confirmed by others in the Intelligence community. 

Next we reported that NSA Whistle blower and cyber security expert Bill Binney looked at the DNC data leaked by WikiLeaks and determined that it was definitively not hacked, it was copied to a disk or flash drive.

Former NSA employee and whistle blower, Bill Binney, reviewed the leaked emails provided online and they show that the data coming from the DNC was not hacked but rather copied to a disk or flash drive!
Binney said:
The problem with the Mueller report and the Rosenstein indictment is it’s all based on lies. I mean the fact they’re still lying about the, saying the DNC was hacked by the Russians and the Russians gave it to WikiLeaks.
Well, we had some of our people and our group, the VIPS, the Veteran Intelligence Professionals, look at the data that WikiLeaks posted on the DNC data. They actually posted the DNC data…
…that entire set of data was read to a thumb drive or a CD Rom then physically transported. Now this is what Kim Dotcom is saying. This is what Julian Assange basically was inferring. Others have been saying the same things.” 
It’s clear the DNC was not hacked and it’s more likely a disgruntled insider like Seth Rich copied the files to a disk drive than that the Russians hacked the DNC.

We next posted more arguments against Mueller’s assertion that the DNC was hacked by Russians. A cybersecurity expert by the name of Yaacov Apelbaum posted an incredible report earlier this year with information basically proving that the DNC was not hacked by the Russians.

Apelbaum’s first argument is this –

Powered by Blogger.